xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 12x performance drop on md/linux+sw raid1 due to barriers [xfs]

To: Peter Grandi <pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 12x performance drop on md/linux+sw raid1 due to barriers [xfs]
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:40:02 -0500
Cc: Linux XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux RAID <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <18757.33373.744917.457587@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk>
Organization: TMR Associates Inc, Schenectady NY
References: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812060928030.14215@p34.internal.lan> <1229225480.16555.152.camel@localhost> <18757.4606.966139.10342@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk> <200812141912.59649.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <18757.33373.744917.457587@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081112 Fedora/1.1.13-1.fc9 pango-text SeaMonkey/1.1.13
Peter Grandi wrote:
Unfortunately that seems the case.

The purpose of barriers is to guarantee that relevant data is
known to be on persistent storage (kind of hardware 'fsync').

In effect write barrier means "tell me when relevant data is on
persistent storage", or less precisely "flush/sync writes now
and tell me when it is done". Properties as to ordering are just
a side effect.

I don't get that sense from the barriers stuff in Documentation, in fact I think it's essentially a pure ordering thing, I don't even see that it has an effect of forcing the data to be written to the device, other than by preventing other writes until the drive writes everything. So we read the intended use differently.


What really bothers me is that there's no obvious need for barriers at the device level if the file system is just a bit smarter and does it's own async io (like aio_*), because you can track writes outstanding on a per-fd basis, so instead of stopping the flow of data to the drive, you can just block a file descriptor and wait for the count of outstanding i/o to drop to zero. That provides the order semantics of barriers as far as I can see, having tirelessly thought about it for ten minutes or so. Oh, and did something very similar decades ago in a long-gone mainframe OS.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>