| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 12x performance drop on md/linux+sw raid1 due to barriers [xfs] |
| From: | Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:35:36 +0100 |
| Cc: | Linux RAID <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <18757.4606.966139.10342@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812060928030.14215@p34.internal.lan> <1229225480.16555.152.camel@localhost> <18757.4606.966139.10342@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk> (sfid-20081214_183524_928808_CA8411E0) |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.9 |
Am Sonntag 14 Dezember 2008 schrieb Peter Grandi: > First of all, why are you people sending TWO copies to the XFS > mailing list? (to both linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx and xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx). [...] > > So its really more of an expectation that wc+barriers on, > > performs better than wc+barriers off :) > > This is of course a misstatement: perhaps you intended to write > that ''wc on+barriers on'' would perform better than ''wc off + > barriers off'. I think Redeeman said exactly that ;-). Either both on or both off. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 12x performance drop on md/linux+sw raid1 due to barriers [xfs], Martin Steigerwald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 12x performance drop on md/linux+sw raid1 due to barriers [xfs], Peter Grandi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 12x performance drop on md/linux+sw raid1 due to barriers [xfs], Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 12x performance drop on md/linux+sw raid1 due to barriers [xfs], Martin Steigerwald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |