| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:57:28 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <493E9AB4.1050505@xfs.org> |
| References: | <492BA7AD.5080007@sgi.com> <20081125081644.GA20644@infradead.org> <492C0B3D.3040002@thebarn.com> <492CA07F.1030803@sgi.com> <492CC201.3080304@xfs.org> <ncc3ah6lyiw.fsf@itchy.melbourne.sgi.com> <20081209091725.GA26180@infradead.org> <493E9AB4.1050505@xfs.org> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:20:04AM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote: > The problem is that you have a tracking branch for xfs-dev so git wants > to leave your branch untouched > until you actually want to update it from the remote branch origin/xfs-dev > What you can do is: > % git-fetch > % git-pull . xfs-dev > > That will pull the latest xfs-dev stuff into your current branch. It might. But remember more than a single command to update a repository is just a braindead design. Especially if I have to remember a branch name. Even CVS got this right.. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |