[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com

To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:26:45 -0500
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <492CE189.2000304@sgi.com>
References: <492BA7AD.5080007@sgi.com> <20081125081644.GA20644@infradead.org> <492C9FB9.3090204@sgi.com> <20081126020009.GF6291@disturbed> <492CC287.3070709@sgi.com> <20081126040840.GG6291@disturbed> <492CE189.2000304@sgi.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 04:41:29PM +1100, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> I was just thinking that if an external developer is working on a clone of
> say the master branch and they have a fix, that they might post a patch
> and say where sgi can pull from (the developer's tree) to receive the 
> patch(es)
> as an easier way to bring stuff in.

So do you want git trees or not now?  I spent quite some time to set up
a tree for my last set of patches, but what got in was slightly
different, so when I pulles I got a merge and duplicates in my tree and
had to git-reset to a point before my patches.  If you do apply from
the list anyway I can avoid that overhead.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>