Am Dienstag 25 November 2008 schrieb Stian Jordet:
> ma., 24.11.2008 kl. 19.36 -0600, skrev Eric Sandeen:
> > I don't know if the storage you're on passes barriers or not, but xfs
> > has barriers on by default, while ext3 does not. ext3 will still
> > likely
> > win the "untar a kernel" race, but for a fairer test, make the
> > barrier settings consistent between the two.
> As I wrote earlier, the point wasn't to find the fastest fs. That's not
> what I'm looking for. I just want xfs to perform at least as good on my
> new workstation as it did on my six years old other workstation.
> Which disabling barriers helped (notice the rm -rf with barriers...
> nobarrier is almost 200 times faster, 10 times faster on the
> ### Ext3
> time bash -c 'tar xjf linux-126.96.36.199.tar.bz2 ; sync'
> real 0m18.663s
> user 0m14.693s
> sys 0m2.828s
> time bash -c 'rm -r linux-188.8.131.52 ; sync'
> real 0m0.635s
> user 0m0.028s
> sys 0m0.564s
It would be interesting to know the value on Ext3 with barriers.
I wonder whether XFS performance with barriers enabled can be improved?
And whether XFS with disabled write cache (via hdparm) but without
barriers might even be *faster* than XFS with barriers... One thing to
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7