xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch 08/12] Fix compat XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT_SINGLE ioctl

To: sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [patch 08/12] Fix compat XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT_SINGLE ioctl
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:35:11 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081126032028.730961152@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20081126032005.639750968@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20081126032028.730961152@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:20:13PM -0600, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT_SINGLE ioctl passes in the
> desired inode number, while XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT passes
> in the previous/last-stat'd inode number.  The
> compat handler wasn't differentiating these, so
> when a XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT_SINGLE request for inode
> 128 was sent in, stat information for 131 was sent out.

Looks good.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>