|To:||Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com|
|From:||Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:32:08 +1100|
|Cc:||xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, "'Russell Cattelan'" <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 220.127.116.11 (X11/20081105)|
Eric Sandeen wrote:
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:Hi all, We've got a new xfs git tree on oss.sgi.com at: git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs This tree is an automatic mirror of our internal tree so will always be up to date. It supercedes the old xfs-2.6 tree which has a few problems with it's merge history. There's a few branches there already: 'master' This will contain all the latest xfs changes not yet pushed to mainline. 'mainline' This is vanilla mainline and will updated regularly. 'for-linus' Our staging branch for pull requests 'xfs-dev' This branch will contain KDB and other supporting code for development and should be identical to the old CVS tree. Feel free to start using it and let us know if you have any issues.First off, cool. Glad to see this progressing. TAKE messages currently have Russell-magic added to the body to link to a cvs commit for that change. (however, it always takes up to 24h to sync...) Will cvs still be around & updated? If not, those messages should be removed (or changed to point to git commits if possible (probably not possible).
The ptools tree will still be updated (as changes go into the xfs-dev branch) so the cvs tree will still be updated too. We'll eventually retire the cvs tree since everything that's in it is also available from git now.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Dave Chinner|
|Next by Date:||Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Lachlan McIlroy|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Russell Cattelan|
|Next by Thread:||Assertion failed: atomic_read(&mp->m_active_trans), Donald Douwsma|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|