| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:28:44 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <492C9FB9.3090204@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <492BA7AD.5080007@xxxxxxx> <20081125081644.GA20644@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <492C9FB9.3090204@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:00:41PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > We would prefer patches based on the master branch but patches can be > against the mainline, master or xfs-dev branches. If a patch against > mainline or xfs-dev doesn't apply cleanly to the master branch we may > ask the author to rebase that patch against the master branch. If a > patch to the master branch needs auxillary changes to files that only > exist in the xfs-dev branch (ie xfsidbg stuff) we may ask for an > additional patch from the author. Seems like a complicated setup, and not very friendly to patch submitters. Why acn't we just submit all patches against the -dev branch? Especially for dmapi-related patches everything else will be a real pain. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |