[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Extreme slowness with xfs [WAS: Re: Slowness with new pc]

To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Extreme slowness with xfs [WAS: Re: Slowness with new pc]
From: Stian Jordet <liste@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:19:16 +0100
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811231721350.22594@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1226760254.5089.11.camel@chevrolet> <430c4fa50811180551r67d5d680tf1ffa493604ac4ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1227476908.32357.5.camel@chevrolet> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811231721350.22594@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
sø., 23.11.2008 kl. 17.25 -0500, skrev Justin Piszcz: 
> As the original posted stated:
> 1. please post dmesg output
> 2. you may want to include your kernel .config
> 3. xfs_info /dev/mdX or /dev/device may also be useful
> 4. you can also check fragmentation:
>     # xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/md2
>     actual 257492, ideal 242687, fragmentation factor 5.75%
> 5. something sounds very strange, I also run XFS on a lot of systems and
>     have never heard of that before..
> 6. also post your /etc/fstab options
> 7. what distribution are you running?
> 8. are -only- the two fujitsu's (raid0) affected or are other arrays
>     affected on this HW as well (separate disks etc)?
> 9. you can also compile in support for latency_top & power_top to see
>     if there is any excessive polling going on by any one specific
>     device/function as well

1 & 2: Oh, sorry I forgot to attach dmesg and config in the last mail.

root@chevrolet:~# xfs_info /dev/sdb1
meta-data=/dev/sdb1              isize=256    agcount=32,
agsize=11426984 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=0
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=365663488,
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096  
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=1
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

root@chevrolet:~# xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/sdb1
actual 380037, ideal 373823, fragmentation factor 1.64%

6: The only mount-option is relatime, which Ubuntu adds automatically.
Hmm. I haven't tried to mount without that option. Well, didn't help
without it neither, tried just now.

7: Ubuntu 8.10 Intrepid. This is a new system, and it has never run
anything other than Intrepid. This affects both the standard kernel, and
the vanilla that I have compiled (dmesg and config attached is
from that kernel). Have also tried both 64 bit and 32 bit (just for fun)

8: I'll explain my setup a little bit more. I explained the hardware in
my first post. But I have the two Fujitsu SAS disks in RAID-0,
with /dev/sda1 as root, and /dev/sda2 as home. Earlier they were both
xfs, and dog slow. I have now converted both to ext3, and everything is
normal. In addition I have four Seagate ST3500320AS 500GB SATA disks in
hardware RAID-5 on the same controller. This 1,5TB array is still xfs.
It also had and has the same symptoms. 

9: I don't know how to do that. But what ever it is, it doesn't happen
with ext3...

Thanks for looking into this!


Attachment: config-
Description: Text document

Attachment: dmesg.txt
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>