|To:||Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: Announce: XFS staging tree|
|From:||Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:07:34 +1100|
|Cc:||xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 188.8.131.52 (Windows/20081105)|
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I've created a new tree of all patches that have been reviewed, and properly QAed but haven't been merged into the SGI tree for reasons unknown to us patch submitters.
Lachlan has about 30 patches almost ready to push back out (mostly yours Christoph). Sorry for the delays and the frustration this is causing. Just waiting for some back-end constipation with ptools to resolve, which will happen early next week.
I'll add all patches that have gotten review on linux-xfs to it after they pass xfsqa for me. Patches will be dropped as soon as they get into the xfs git tree.
On-going, this might be a better way to manage the patch queue, at least possibly better in terms of front-line QA. Maybe an almost-open-access git repository for incomming patches could work too. What do others think? Cheers -- Mark
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: couple small xfstest patches, Matthew Kent|
|Next by Date:||Re: [PATCH] fix spurious gcc warnings, Christoph Hellwig|
|Previous by Thread:||Announce: XFS staging tree, Christoph Hellwig|
|Next by Thread:||[PATCH V2] clean up printk formats with DMAPI_DEBUG, Eric Sandeen|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|