| To: | sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 07/11] Fix compat XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT_SINGLE ioctl |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:10:47 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20081119044909.789177139@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20081119044401.573365619@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20081119044909.789177139@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:44:08PM -0600, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > The XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT_SINGLE ioctl passes in the > desired inode number, while XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT passes > in the previous/last-stat'd inode number. The > compat handler wasn't differentiating these, so > when a XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT_SINGLE request for inode > 128 was sent in, stat information for 131 was sent out. Looks good. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 05/11] Make the bulkstat_one compat ioctl handling more sane, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch 06/11] Fix xfs_bulkstat_one size checks & error handling, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [patch 07/11] Fix compat XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT_SINGLE ioctl, sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [patch 11/11] Reorder xfs_ioctl32.c for some tidiness, sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |