| To: | sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 00/11] RFC: compat ioctl fixes/cleanups/additions |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:16:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20081119044401.573365619@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20081119044401.573365619@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:44:01PM -0600, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > This should properly hook up all ioctls which need compat > handlers on intel or ppc; it passes the auto qa group on intel, > and does ok on ppc (there are still issues with xfsdump itself > if the ppc page size is large (64k in my case)) > > This might be a little overboard; I'm half tempted to remove the > handlers that only intel boxes need; would anyone be running 32-bit > apps calling xfs ioctls on x86_64 or ia64? Seems unlikely; and > removing them would cut down the size of this patchset: Yes, I run a complete 32bit userspace on x86_64 kernels quite often. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [patch 03/11] Add compat handlers for data & rt growfs ioctls, sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch 01/11] Move compat ioctl structs & numbers into xfs_ioctl32.h, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 03/11] Add compat handlers for data & rt growfs ioctls, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 989944 - mkfs.xfs ignores -i maxpct option, Barry Naujok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |