| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5? |
| From: | John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:14:44 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811010758240.1053@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | None; Disorganization: Total |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811010424270.16517@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <490C359F.7080504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811010758240.1053@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
On 01/11/2008 12:00, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, John Robinson wrote:On 01/11/2008 08:29, Justin Piszcz wrote: [...]Why is running 3 jobs con-currently that take care of two parts each more thantwice as fast than running one job for six parts?Because you have multiple CPUs?So 1/4 of a quad core q6600 cannot achieve higher rates of I/O due to the parity operations being that costly?Is the only way to increase the single-threaded speed to increase the maximum CPU core speed/get a faster CPU, and/or theoretically a multi-threaded md-raidcould maximize throughput? Actually I was thinking that your test job - I think you said it used tar - is single-threaded and CPU-bound on one core, and doesn't saturate the MD subsystem. Your jobs are 75% user time to 25% system time, and the user time is not parellelisable until you do it yourself by splitting the work up. Cheers, John. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | account balance, Lloyds TSB Bank |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |