| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5? |
| From: | John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:55:27 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811010424270.16517@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | None; Disorganization: Total |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811010424270.16517@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
On 01/11/2008 08:29, Justin Piszcz wrote: [...] Why is running 3 jobs con-currently that take care of two parts each more thantwice as fast than running one job for six parts? Because you have multiple CPUs? Cheers, John. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |