| To: | John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5? |
| From: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:00:34 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <490C359F.7080504@anonymous.org.uk> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811010424270.16517@p34.internal.lan> <490C359F.7080504@anonymous.org.uk> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) |
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, John Robinson wrote: On 01/11/2008 08:29, Justin Piszcz wrote: [...]Why is running 3 jobs con-currently that take care of two parts each more than
Is the only way to increase the single-threaded speed to increase the maximum CPU core speed/get a faster CPU, and/or theoretically a multi-threaded md-raid could maximize throughput? Justin. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, John Robinson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, John Robinson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, John Robinson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, John Robinson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |