| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: assertion failure with latest xfs |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:29:41 +1100 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4907B1B3.4020008@xxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <49003EFF.4090404@xxxxxxx> <20081023173149.GA30316@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081023222126.GA18495@disturbed> <4907B1B3.4020008@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:43:31AM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Dave Chinner wrote: >> Hmmmm - there's also another bug in xfs_iget_cache_hit() - we don't >> drop the reference we got if we found an unlinked inode after the >> igrab() (the ENOENT case). I'll fix that as well. >> >> Patch below that I'm currently running through xfsqa. > > I gave this patch a go and it still asserted at the same place running > the same test. Can you put more inode trace points in so that we can see where the extra reference is coming from? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 0/9] writeback data integrity and other fixes (take 3), Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 987246 - Fix race when looking up reclaimable inodes, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: assertion failure with latest xfs, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: assertion failure with latest xfs, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |