[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Urgent queue

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Urgent queue
From: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:37:15 +1100
In-reply-to: <20081028064150.GS4985@disturbed>
Organization: SGI Engineering
References: <20081027133010.GA30607@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081028064150.GS4985@disturbed>
Reply-to: markgw@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20080914)

Dave Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:30:10AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Two patches that are small bugfixes / features that are what I consider the
immediately merge queue.

The entire set of 30 patches has passed XFSQA on my test box....

individually (by series) or only after all 30? Bisectability is important,
as Christoph alluded to in another thread. Is the intention to try and take
this lot for 28-rc3? I think Lachlan is now very close to a pull req for
.28, depending on his testing for the memleak and deadlock fixes - time
is now getting pretty short :)

-- Mark

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>