| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Urgent queue |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:37:15 +1100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20081028064150.GS4985@disturbed> |
| Organization: | SGI Engineering |
| References: | <20081027133010.GA30607@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081028064150.GS4985@disturbed> |
| Reply-to: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) |
Dave Chinner wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:30:10AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:Two patches that are small bugfixes / features that are what I consider the immediately merge queue.The entire set of 30 patches has passed XFSQA on my test box.... individually (by series) or only after all 30? Bisectability is important, as Christoph alluded to in another thread. Is the intention to try and take this lot for 28-rc3? I think Lachlan is now very close to a pull req for .28, depending on his testing for the memleak and deadlock fixes - time is now getting pretty short :) Cheers -- Mark |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Сдаем СРОЧНО (без посредников) офисное помещение, Наталья |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] Implement generic freeze feature, Takashi Sato |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Urgent queue, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Urgent queue, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |