[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Urgent queue

To: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Urgent queue
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:53:21 -0400
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4906EB5B.2020004@xxxxxxx>
References: <20081027133010.GA30607@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081028064150.GS4985@disturbed> <4906EB5B.2020004@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:37:15PM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
> individually (by series) or only after all 30? Bisectability is important,
> as Christoph alluded to in another thread. Is the intention to try and take
> this lot for 28-rc3? I think Lachlan is now very close to a pull req for
> .28, depending on his testing for the memleak and deadlock fixes - time
> is now getting pretty short :)

Even urgent isn't urgent enough for the first 2.6.28 series, please get
that one out ASAP, I don't want to miss it.  The two patches from the
urgent queue are something I would consider for a second .28 pull,
everything else is .29 material.

But it would be highly useful if we could open up a .29 staging tree that
can be QAed and included in linux-next ASAP..

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>