| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? |
| From: | Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:59:50 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <49063F75.7000604@xxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Lueck Data Systems |
| References: | <gde1k2$gkp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ge38k5$qf$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49063F75.7000604@xxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | news <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707) |
Bill Kendall wrote: I tried to reproduce this using the command line you supplied, but everything worked as expected for me. Glad to hear that. Seems my tried and true syntax _can_ still work. Perhaps try it without the -i (so that only subtrees given with -s are restored), just to rule out the possibility that you inadvertently added all files to the restore list. Enough putzing with a production server I think. It was odd that it only put back files present in that old backup set and did not overwrite everything... thankfully! Anyway, thanks for checking / verifying my usual restore syntax that it is the correct syntax. -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] remove xfs_vfsops.h, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong?, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong?, Bill Kendall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong?, Timothy Shimmin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |