[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture

To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Tobias Frost <tobi@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, debian-arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:48:53 +0300
In-reply-to: <20081017094615.GT4504@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1222893502.5020.40.camel@moria> <20081002004556.GB30001@disturbed> <48E4213E.9090508@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20081016212500.GA27228@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F7BC9F.4080909@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20081017070109.GA30726@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081017094615.GT4504@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-29)
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:46:15AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:01:09AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-10-16 17:13]:
> > > So is this a regression?  did it used to work?  If so, when? :)
> > 
> > The original report was with 2.6.18 but that was with the old ABI:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423562
> > I just installed a 2.6.22 kernel with EABI and I can also trigger
> > the bug.  So it's not a (recent) regression.
> As far as I can remember (I only used old ABI arm) this is not a 
> regression. XFS never worked on arm for me.

You are wrong. 

Our team have experience with XFS on ARM OABI on NAS. It worked fine on
2.6.12, but got broken on 2.6.17.


Regards,  Kirill A. Shutemov
 + Belarus, Minsk
 + ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>