| To: | Jianjun Kong <jianjun@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] XFS fix remount rw with unrecognized options |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:36:37 +1100 |
| Cc: | Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20081016134112.GA8773@ubuntu> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Jianjun Kong <jianjun@xxxxxxxxx>, Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20081016002926.D912558FA22B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081016134112.GA8773@ubuntu> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:41:12PM +0800, Jianjun Kong wrote: > > And the code above "return 0" can not be executed, so delete them. > __________________________________________ > #if 0 > printk(KERN_INFO > "XFS: mount option \"%s\" not supported for remount\n", p); > return -EINVAL; > #else > > return 0; > ----------------------------------------- That ifdef was added to stub out the behaviour we *actually want* remount to have when it encounters an invalid remount option. The reason for leaving it is in the next release we should have all the other problems we discovered by doing this fixed, so that code will be re-enabled. Hence the temporary #if 0 around it. So at this point, don't remove it. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: another problem with latest code drops, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [stable] [PATCH] XFS fix remount rw with unrecognized options, Greg KH |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] XFS fix remount rw with unrecognized options, Américo Wang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] XFS fix remount rw with unrecognized options, Timothy Shimmin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |