| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: another problem with latest code drops |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:08:05 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <48F6FCB7.6050905@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <48F6A19D.9080900@xxxxxxx> <20081016060247.GF25906@disturbed> <48F6EF7F.4070008@xxxxxxx> <20081016072019.GH25906@disturbed> <48F6FCB7.6050905@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:35:03PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > I'm not seeing a leak in that slab - actually that slab doesn't even > show up. I am seeing a lot of memory used here though: Are you using slab or slub? The latter merges caches of equal size, so it's totally useless for the kind of debug stats Dave looked at. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: crash with latest code drop., Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:471! with kernel 2.6.26.6, Alessandro Bono |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: another problem with latest code drops, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: another problem with latest code drops, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |