| To: | "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control? |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:58:56 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <48ED0DA9.7070002@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <48ED0DA9.7070002@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 12:44:41PM -0700, Linda A. Walsh wrote: > I was looking at powertop again recently, and noticed xfsbufd and > xfsaild at the top of the wakeup list. xfsbufd can be tuned with > /proc/sys/fs/xfs/xfsbufd_centisecs along with 3 other time-related > tunables. However, I don't see one for xfsaild. Is that an > oversight? No. The xfsaild is currently operating with watchdog functionality to catch AIL push stalls due to a know problem that this new patch: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00119.html fixes. After this has been included for a while (say a release), I plan to remove the watchdog feature of the xfsaild so the once-per-second-per-XFS-filesystem wakeup will go away then. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS: replace the mount inode list with radix tree traversals, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control?, Linda Walsh |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |