| To: | Tom <T-o-m@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Which XFS-options for best performance in my case? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:54:36 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <001d01c92498$a4bd7b40$ee3871c0$@net> |
| References: | <001d01c92498$a4bd7b40$ee3871c0$@net> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) |
Tom wrote: > After having fine tuned the RAID-controller and the kernel settings, I am > reaching the following results: Read 465 MB/s; Write 296 MB/s, which I > benchmarked with "sync; bonnie++ -u 0 -r 4096 -b -d > /name_of_the_mounted_partition". These figures are not all to good. not good based on / compared to what? First I'd start with direct reads & writes from/to your block device, see how fast that goes, before you jump up to benchmarking the filesystem. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Which XFS-options for best performance in my case?, Tom |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS Regression Issue in kernel 2.6.26.3, Albert Graham |
| Previous by Thread: | Which XFS-options for best performance in my case?, Tom |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Which XFS-options for best performance in my case?, Tom |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |