| To: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Urgent queue |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:53:21 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4906EB5B.2020004@sgi.com> |
| References: | <20081027133010.GA30607@infradead.org> <20081028064150.GS4985@disturbed> <4906EB5B.2020004@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:37:15PM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote: > individually (by series) or only after all 30? Bisectability is important, > as Christoph alluded to in another thread. Is the intention to try and take > this lot for 28-rc3? I think Lachlan is now very close to a pull req for > .28, depending on his testing for the memleak and deadlock fixes - time > is now getting pretty short :) Even urgent isn't urgent enough for the first 2.6.28 series, please get that one out ASAP, I don't want to miss it. The two patches from the urgent queue are something I would consider for a second .28 pull, everything else is .29 material. But it would be highly useful if we could open up a .29 staging tree that can be QAed and included in linux-next ASAP.. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Map a disk LBA to filename?, Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Сдаем СРОЧНО (без посредников) офисное помещение, Наталья |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Urgent queue, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 2/2] allow inode64 mount option on 32 bit systems, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |