| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? |
| From: | Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:59:50 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <49063F75.7000604@sgi.com> |
| Organization: | Lueck Data Systems |
| References: | <gde1k2$gkp$1@ger.gmane.org> <ge38k5$qf$1@ger.gmane.org> <49063F75.7000604@sgi.com> |
| Reply-to: | mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707) |
Bill Kendall wrote: I tried to reproduce this using the command line you supplied, but everything worked as expected for me.
Perhaps try it without the -i (so that only subtrees given with -s are restored), just to rule out the possibility that you inadvertently added all files to the restore list.
It was odd that it only put back files present in that old backup set and did not overwrite everything... thankfully! Anyway, thanks for checking / verifying my usual restore syntax that it is the correct syntax. -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] remove xfs_vfsops.h, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong?, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong?, Bill Kendall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong?, Timothy Shimmin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |