| To: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS performance tracking and regression monitoring |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:37:58 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20081024035411.GH18495@disturbed> |
| References: | <490108E6.7060502@sgi.com> <20081024035411.GH18495@disturbed> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) |
Dave Chinner wrote: > Perhap you might want to look more closely at FFSB - it has a > fairly interesting automated test harness. e.g. it was used to > produce these: > > http://btrfs.boxacle.net/ > > And you can probably set up custom workloads to cover all the things > that the standard benchmarks do..... I was going to suggest that too, those are some nifty charts. :) ffsb takes workload recipes so you can make it do a large variety of things... -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours, Mail Delivery Subsystem |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | failure notice, mail-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS performance tracking and regression monitoring, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/2] convert xfs_getbmap to take formatter functions, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |