xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: another problem with latest code drops

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: another problem with latest code drops
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:13:47 +1000
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20081016090805.GA32101@infradead.org>
References: <48F6A19D.9080900@sgi.com> <20081016060247.GF25906@disturbed> <48F6EF7F.4070008@sgi.com> <20081016072019.GH25906@disturbed> <48F6FCB7.6050905@sgi.com> <20081016090805.GA32101@infradead.org>
Reply-to: lachlan@xxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:35:03PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
I'm not seeing a leak in that slab - actually that slab doesn't even
show up.  I am seeing a lot of memory used here though:

Are you using slab or slub? The latter merges caches of equal size, so it's totally useless for the kind of debug stats Dave looked at.

It's slub.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>