| To: | Török Edwin <edwintorok@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Speed of rm compared to reiserfs (slow) - and switching logdevices |
| From: | Török Edwin <edwintorok@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:34:21 +0300 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wrd2ySwIlt6mdYIOi7cwW3ASSAhhVJU7J40f0G381kE=; b=qV40Jb/XAt58xJcw8b32M7/xB/TsyjltXtDJwr0jwsreS9rzZNd1TZCkA6d+MAmmFq Mp60qQ2Gwr+sPLcjpDS5ZHyUadZ3iomSo1cWE9KQXcu68bedeIWvXe2eOnV8Zyq5bMaw JObX8aJvic8t+3j4UCgwfe495f6uCVqknO1+k= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LIw3PitiG5uTdAisp4WuE0DmFARxt18dT/LJ7S/UaroZD3NRNkt5iByXn21d/8qLnW iOwMu/F2bUyFkDVfYLF7sGfWS44r6RH6yOn3smnc884tpgwPOQf1raYh/08XHyGzkXAf smjX1RZS1kNCkcWJhzmVs4tEzr/QTWv7zRORg= |
| In-reply-to: | <48DC9227.6060908@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <48D9FDA1.8050701@xxxxxxxxx> <20080925002724.GA27997@disturbed> <48DB48E3.3020104@xxxxxxxxx> <20080925235453.GF27997@disturbed> <48DC9227.6060908@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) |
On 2008-09-26 10:41, Török Edwin wrote: > On 2008-09-26 02:54, Dave Chinner wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:16:35AM +0300, Török Edwin wrote: >> >> >>> On 2008-09-25 03:27, Dave Chinner wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:43:13AM +0300, Török Edwin wrote: >>>> >>>> >>> Thanks for the suggestions, the time for rm has improved a bit, but is >>> still slower than reiserfs: >>> >>> time rm -rf gcc >>> >>> real 1m18.818s >>> user 0m0.156s >>> sys 0m11.777s >>> >>> Is there anything else I can try to make it faster? >>> >>> >> Buy more disks. ;) >> >> XFS is not really optimised for single disk, metadata intensive, >> small file workloads. >> > > I have 6 disks, in raid10 :) > I moved the logdevice to another disk (not part of RAID array), and now the speed of rm is down to 30 seconds! I didn't find any documentation on how to convert an XFS fs with internal log device to use external, so I did the following: # xfs_db -x /dev/mapper/vg--all-lv--opt xfs_db>sb xfs_db> write logstart 0 xfs_db> quit The zero the logdevice, and mount using logdev=. This worked. However if I now use xfs_repair on this filesystem it restores the internal log. Is there a way to make this change permanent? (i.e. switch permanently to using external log?) Best regards, --Edwin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: inode64 question, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Speed of rm compared to reiserfs (slow) - and switching logdevices, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Speed of rm compared to reiserfs (slow), Török Edwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Speed of rm compared to reiserfs (slow) - and switching logdevices, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |