| To: | Takashi Sato <t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature |
| From: | Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:35:25 -0400 |
| Cc: | Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:52:35 +0900." <D0B0D91F884647D6808626CDFF81E532@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080908205337t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080908171119.GB22521@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48DBFD42.6030307@xxxxxxxxxx> <D0B0D91F884647D6808626CDFF81E532@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:52:35 +0900, Takashi Sato said: (Sorry, am reading the threads out of temporal sequence....) > I think that your concern is that the freezer cannot recognize the occurrence > of a timeout and it continues the backup process and the backup data is > corrupted finally. > If the freezer can recognize it by the unfreeze ioctl's errono, will your > concern > be solved? > If so, I will implement it. That would also address my concerns about merging patches 8 and 10 of the other patch series (because patch 10 wouldn't be needed then)...
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2] Use atomic_t and wait_event to track dquot pincount, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: inode64 question, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature, Takashi Sato |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |