[Top] [All Lists]

Re: REVIEW: Fix for incore extent corruption.

To: lachlan@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: REVIEW: Fix for incore extent corruption.
From: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:30:01 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: "Russell Cattelan" <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <48D218AE.9090400@xxxxxxx>
References: <48D19A83.4040608@xxxxxxxxxxx> <48D1CD46.4010104@xxxxxxx> <48D1DCD5.7040502@xxxxxxxxxxx> <48D218AE.9090400@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.0.1.el5.centos.2
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> Russell, this fixes xfs_iext_irec_compact_full().  If we don't move
> all the records from the next page into the current page then we need
> to update the er_extoff of the modified page as we move the remaining
> extents up.  Would you mind giving it a go?
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c      2008-09-18 18:48:46.000000000 +1000
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c      2008-09-18 18:57:18.000000000 +1000
> @@ -4623,6 +4623,7 @@ xfs_iext_irec_compact_full(
>                                       (XFS_LINEAR_EXTS -
>                                               erp_next->er_extcount) *
>                                       sizeof(xfs_bmbt_rec_t));
> +                             erp_next->er_extoff += ext_diff;
>                       }
>               }

Lachlan, I concur.  I spent way too long last night looking at this and
arrived at the same conclusion about the root cause of the problem, but
didn't hae *quite* the right solution.  I blame it on 2am ;)  Your fix
looks right.

(though I'd probably move the erp_next changes into the else clause? 
Otherwise you're changing it then freeing it.)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>