xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/6] XFS: mark inodes for reclaim via a tag in the inode radi

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] XFS: mark inodes for reclaim via a tag in the inode radix tree
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:26:49 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080915211425.GF29743@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <1221315300-30336-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1221315300-30336-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080915211425.GF29743@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 05:14:26PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:14:56AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Prepare for removing the deleted inode list by marking inodes
> > for reclaim in the inode radix trees so that we can use the
> > radix trees to find reclaimable inodes.
> 
> Any reason this is split from patch 4 in the series?  Looks good
> otherwise.

Yeah - so I can test each change as I write it. Adding the tag
didn't cause any problems, changing to traverse based on the tag
didn't cause any problems, removing the old list didn't cause any
problems.  i.e. the patches are small, easily verifiable steps.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>