| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] XFS: factor xfs_iget_core() into hit and miss cases |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:12:10 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1221314627-29065-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1221314627-29065-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1221314627-29065-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:03:45AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > There are really two cases in xfs_iget_core(). The first is the > cache hit case, the second is the miss case. They share very little > code, and hence can easily be factored out into separate functions. > This makes the code much easier to understand and subsequently > modify. Looks good. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] XFS: Never call mark_inode_dirty_sync() directly, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] XFS: move inode reclaim functions to xfs_sync.c, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 1/3] XFS: factor xfs_iget_core() into hit and miss cases, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 0/3] XFS: Combine Linux and XFS inodes, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |