| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] XFS: Combine the XFS and Linux inodes V2 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:31:28 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1221315027-29951-4-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1221315027-29951-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1221315027-29951-4-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:10:27AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> + * we need to provide an empty inode free function to prevent
> + * the generic code from trying to free ouuur combined inode.
^^^^ spelling?
> -
> -STATIC void
> -xfs_fs_inode_init_once(
> - void *vnode)
> + struct inode *inode)
> {
> - inode_init_once((struct inode *)vnode);
> + return;
> }
No need for a no-argument return at the end of the function.
> static inline int xfs_icount(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> {
> - struct inode *inode = VFS_I(ip);
> -
> - if (!inode)
> - return atomic_read(&inode->i_count);
> - return -1;
> + return atomic_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_count);
> }
At this point we can just kill this helper - there's only one caller
anyway.
> - if (xfs_iflush(ip, sync_mode) == 0) {
> + if (!VN_BAD(VFS_I(ip)) && xfs_iflush(ip, sync_mode) == 0) {
Why don't you switch to is_bad_inode directly instead of fixing this
up in a later patch?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/10] XFS: clean up sync code, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS does not recognise mount options in 2.6.27-rc6, Frederik Himpe |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 3/3] XFS: Combine the XFS and Linux inodes V2, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] XFS: Combine the XFS and Linux inodes V2, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |