[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature

To: Takashi Sato <t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:11:19 -0400
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx" <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "axboe@xxxxxxxxx" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, "mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20080908205337t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080908205337t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:53:37PM +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
> The timeout feature is added to "freeze ioctl" to solve a deadlock
> when the freezer accesses a frozen filesystem. And new ioctl
> to reset the timeout period is added to extend the timeout period.
> For example, the freezer resets the timeout period to 10 seconds every 5
> seconds.  In this approach, even if the freezer causes a deadlock by
> accessing the frozen filesystem, it will be solved by the timeout
> in 10 seconds and the freezer will be able to recognize that
> at the next reset of timeout period.

And as with all previous posting I still fundamentally disagree about
the need of this functionality.  We don't need a timeout for freezing.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>