| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Unlock inode before calling xfs_idestroy() |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:01:26 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <48D3193C.6060201@sgi.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <48D3193C.6060201@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:15:08PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Lock debugging reported the ilock was being destroyed > without being unlocked. Is this going to go in before or after my changes to refactor this function? If it is before< can you please push it out to the master git tree ASAP (and all the other outstanding changes) so I can rediff all the outstanding patches I have before I send them again? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 6/8] XFS: Given the log a pointer to the AIL, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | We would like to invite you to join us for the 2nd international conference E-Medisys, E-Medisys 2008 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Unlock inode before calling xfs_idestroy(), Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Unlock inode before calling xfs_idestroy(), Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |