| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Tweak tracing allocation sizes |
| From: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:06:54 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lachlan@xxxxxxx, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20080902215516.GE9204@infradead.org> |
| References: | <48BCD3BE.5040107@sgi.com> <20080902055604.GD15962@disturbed> <48BCD93E.9040407@sgi.com> <87fxojvy5v.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20080902215516.GE9204@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 05:55:16PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:50:52AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > alternative - maybe a very large global trace buffer that is allocated at > > > mount > > > time and shared by all inodes? > > > > You could use vmalloc(). While that is also not fast it will at least > > not stall. > > In fact kmem_alloc first tries vmalloc, and then falls back to slab > when it fails. See fs/xfs/linux-2.6/kmem.c:kmem_alloc(). You mean the other way around? Anyways it sounds like like MAX_SLAB_SIZE is just too big. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | REVIEW: Change mkfs.xfs to set primary superblock inodes in ALL secondaries, Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Tweak tracing allocation sizes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Tweak tracing allocation sizes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Tweak tracing allocation sizes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |