xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [2.6.27-rc4] XFS i_lock vs i_iolock...

To: David Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [2.6.27-rc4] XFS i_lock vs i_iolock...
From: Peter Leckie <pleckie@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:20:27 +1000
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@xxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080826193508.GA17542@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6278d2220808221412x28f4ac5dl508884c8030b364a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080825010213.GO5706@disturbed> <48B21507.9050708@xxxxxxx> <20080825035542.GR5706@disturbed> <1219647573.20732.28.camel@twins> <20080825215532.GB28188@xxxxxx> <20080826024547.GX5706@disturbed> <20080826193508.GA17542@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070305)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Looks good.  We probably don't need the #ifdef DEBUG as ASSERT is
debug-only anyway.
Hey Dave did you want to update the patch?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>