| To: | Dan Redig <dan@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_quota free |
| From: | Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:12:12 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, burgwalds@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3302272903.2274591@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3302272903.2274591@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2008, Dan Redig wrote: I'm running 2.6.22 on CentOS 4.4. I don't have the version of The post I mentioned was just one of a few search results. It said that this would be fixed in "recent kernels". The post is from 10/2007, where kernel 2.6.23 was "current", so the statement is rather vague :-\ XFS tools on me right now. I do believe I got the right package. Would the 32 bit binaries format and manipulate he other features of XFS properly and only fail on free blocks? Please see Eric's post; what system (kernel, userland) are you on? C. -- BOFH excuse #301: appears to be a Slow/Narrow SCSI-0 Interface problem |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Regression? 2.6.27-rc3 segfault on cold boot; not on warm boot., David Greaves |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: agi unlinked bucket, Christian Kujau |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_quota free, Dan Redig |
| Next by Thread: | xfs shutdown with 2.6.27-rc4, Nagy Zoltan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |