On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 01:21:02PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>> - a different xfs_version.h - IMHO we should just kill this versioning
>> scheme completely..
>> - xfsidbg. Maybe now with kgdb in the kgdb folks get something
>> submitted and then this is taken care off..
> That stuff is there for kdb. Are you suggesting we switch to kgdb and
> drop this file?
No, sorry for the stupid typo. I meant now with kgdb in maybe the kdb
folks can get their act together and try to submit it, at which point
xfsidbg could go upstream.
>> - modular quota. IMHO we should just stop doing this in CVS, it
>> doesn't really buy us anything. If people are okay with that
>> I'll send a patch
> I don't see any problem with this. Seems like a good idea.
Ok, I'll prepare something.
>> - dmapi - well, this won't get merged and currently I don't see anyone
>> doing HSM for mainline properly. But I have some ideas how to make
>> it less intrusive at least
> All that would be very helpful.
> Last time I checked the fs/xfs differences between mainline and our
> internal tree resulted in a patch around 470KB. Most of that is changes
> that we don't push to mainline such as fs/xfs/dmapi and fs/xfs/xfsidbg.c.
> The rest I'm working though.
Yeah, the list above should have been complete, I just went through the