| To: | Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE 985525 - Fix use after free in xfs_log_done(). |
| From: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:07:28 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200808131115.03350.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080812044629.B2DE858C52A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200808122253.57666.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20080812_225744_709880_4EB8AD8F) <200808131115.03350.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | lachlan@xxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707) |
Martin Steigerwald wrote: Am Dienstag 12 August 2008 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:Am Dienstag 12 August 2008 schrieb Lachlan McIlroy:Fix use after free in xfs_log_done(). The ticket allocation code got reworked in 2.6.26 and we now free tickets whereas before we used to cache them so the use-after-free went undetected.Is this intended to go to stable tree? How serious is this? I intend to update my laptops to 2.6.26.Nevermind, I just applied the patch. Okay. We've only seen this bug once and I'm surprised it happened at all so I wouldn't consider it a serious problem. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] btree test harness, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS Lock debugging noise or real problem?, Linda Walsh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE 985525 - Fix use after free in xfs_log_done()., Martin Steigerwald |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE 985525 - Fix use after free in xfs_log_done()., Martin Steigerwald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |