| To: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS Lock debugging noise or real problem? |
| From: | "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:28:46 -0700 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <48A0F9FC.1070805@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <48A093A7.40606@xxxxxxxxx> <48A09CA9.9080705@xxxxxxxxxxx> <48A0F686.2090700@xxxxxxxxx> <48A0F9FC.1070805@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
Eric Sandeen wrote: Is it also known, (and the same bug) when you get the lock warnings when doing... "xfs_restore", as well (dio_get_page and xfs_ilock)...Doesn't give me the warm & fuzzies, but I'm sure you've heard that sentiment plenty of times...The bugs with 'sort', & imap were both with xfs_ilock and shrink_icache_memory. I saw another bug (different prog) with those two locks that was said to be a bug in XFS by Andrew Morton, but he didn't say if it was the same known "harmless" "bug" or if it was more serious. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE 985525 - Fix use after free in xfs_log_done()., Martin Steigerwald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] CRED: Alter XFS so as to avoid namespace collisions with upcoming COW creds, James Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem?, Linda Walsh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS Lock debugging noise or real problem?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |