|To:||xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: XFS Lock debugging noise or real problem?|
|From:||"Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:28:46 -0700|
|Cc:||Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|References:||<48A093A7.40606@xxxxxxxxx> <48A09CA9.9080705@xxxxxxxxxxx> <48A0F686.2090700@xxxxxxxxx> <48A0F9FC.1070805@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 184.108.40.206 (Windows/20080708)|
Eric Sandeen wrote:
Is it also known, (and the same bug) when you get the lock warnings when doing...
"xfs_restore", as well (dio_get_page and xfs_ilock)...Doesn't give me the warm & fuzzies, but I'm sure you've heard that sentiment plenty
of times...The bugs with 'sort', & imap were both with xfs_ilock and shrink_icache_memory.
I saw another bug (different prog) with those two locks that was said to be a bug in XFS by Andrew Morton, but he didn't say if it was the same known "harmless" "bug" or
if it was more serious.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: TAKE 985525 - Fix use after free in xfs_log_done()., Martin Steigerwald|
|Next by Date:||Re: [PATCH 1/2] CRED: Alter XFS so as to avoid namespace collisions with upcoming COW creds, James Morris|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem?, Linda Walsh|
|Next by Thread:||Re: XFS Lock debugging noise or real problem?, Dave Chinner|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|