| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE 985525 - Fix use after free in xfs_log_done(). |
| From: | Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:53:57 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20080812044629.B2DE858C52A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080812044629.B2DE858C52A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20080812_090830_868736_2FA77162) |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.9 |
Am Dienstag 12 August 2008 schrieb Lachlan McIlroy: > Fix use after free in xfs_log_done(). > > The ticket allocation code got reworked in 2.6.26 and we now free > tickets whereas before we used to cache them so the use-after-free > went undetected. Is this intended to go to stable tree? How serious is this? I intend to update my laptops to 2.6.26. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] XFS: move sync code to its own file, Martin Steigerwald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS Lock debugging noise or real problem?, Linda A. Walsh |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE 985525 - Fix use after free in xfs_log_done()., Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE 985525 - Fix use after free in xfs_log_done()., Martin Steigerwald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |