| To: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [nfsv4] AD review: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gss-v2-03] |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:20:47 +1000 |
| Cc: | trev <trev@xxxxxxx>, "Kevin G. Snow" <kgsnow@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <48A01140.3070306@xxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | SGI Engineering |
| References: | <48A01140.3070306@xxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
whoops - fwd'd the wrong message - ignore. Mark Goodwin wrote: Trev, Kevin, whomever ... has anyone changed anything recently regarding filtering in-line URLs posted to the xfs@oss list? Thanks -- Mark -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [nfsv4] AD review: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gss-v2-03 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:05:34 +0300 From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@xxxxxxxxx> To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@xxxxxxxx> Section 1, paragraph 0:RPCSEC_GSS version 2 (RPCSEC_GSSv2) is the same as RPCSEC_GSSversion1 (RPCSEC_GSSv1) except that support for channel bindings has been added.I'd be good to add a citation to [2] for RPCSEC_GSSv1 and RFC5056 for "channel bindings." We can do that with an RFC Editor Note - send me one. Section 7., paragraph 1:The security considerations are the same as [2].This document is all about applying a security mechanism (channel bindings) to [2]. Surely this raises new security considerations? If not, please explain why not - this is surely something the security directorate will want to know. _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 -- Mark Goodwin markgw@xxxxxxx Engineering Manager for XFS and PCP Phone: +61-3-99631937 SGI Australian Software Group Cell: +61-4-18969583 ------------------------------------------------------------- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Fwd: [nfsv4] AD review: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gss-v2-03], Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Fwd: Re: TAKE 981498 - Use KM_NOFS for debug trace buffers], Mark Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | [Fwd: [nfsv4] AD review: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gss-v2-03], Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | [Fwd: Re: TAKE 981498 - Use KM_NOFS for debug trace buffers], Mark Goodwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |