xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE 981498 - Use KM_NOFS for debug trace buffers

To: Bhagi rathi <jahnu77@xxxxxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TAKE 981498 - Use KM_NOFS for debug trace buffers
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 07:03:55 +1000
In-reply-to: <20080806202746.GC6119@disturbed>
Mail-followup-to: Bhagi rathi <jahnu77@xxxxxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20080806061553.A8D8958C52A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cc7060690808061012x43511581m15c794e72129becc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080806201957.GQ21635@disturbed> <20080806202746.GC6119@disturbed>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 06:27:46AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 06:19:57AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:42:15PM +0530, Bhagi rathi wrote:
> > > I couldn't get a chance to read the diff's completely. If I click on
> > > Lachlan's url for diff's, I couldn't access them. It looks to me that
> > > the issue is not just with trace buffers. It can extend to xfs_iformat
> > > as well. The same dead-lock can spring via
> > > 
> > > xfs_iread -> xfs_iformat -> xfs_iformat_extents -> xfs_iext_add ->
> > > xfs_iext_inline_to_direct -> which can do kmem_alloc with
> > > KM_SLEEP flag.
> > 
> > Fixed already:
> > 
> > 
> 
> Hmmm. where did that url go? Try again:

Ok, something is stripping URLs out of emails. I just sent that URL
to myself and it wasn't stripped so it's not my mail infrastructure
that is doing it.

Did someone "upgrade" the spam filters on oss.sgi.com or the
barracuda overnight?

The link - minus the "http://"; bit is:

oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/xfs-2.6.git;a=commit;h=8c6266658cb76e282c14cb92f8ba5a1c674f4928

let's see if that gets stripped....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>