[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 00/26] generic btree implementation, version 3

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/26] generic btree implementation, version 3
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 02:49:24 +0200
In-reply-to: <20080804015425.GE6119@disturbed>
References: <20080804013158.GA8819@xxxxxx> <20080804015425.GE6119@disturbed>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:54:25AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > The alloc and inobt trees were in fact using the almost exact sequence
> > built from ->set_root and ->free_block but the odd way to pass the
> > block to be freed made this non-obvious.  By changing the calling
> > convention to the normal one this one could be unified.  I've left
> > in some nasty asserts to ensure the assumptions about these blocks
> > wasn't wrong.
> Ok. I'll comment on it when the patches come through....

The killroot unification turned out to be buggy, I'll fix it in the
next round of patches.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>