[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question about extended attributes...

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question about extended attributes...
From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:13:57 +1000
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20080801123253.GG6201@disturbed>
References: <48925495.7040804@xxxxxxxxx> <4892B361.9030900@xxxxxxx> <20080801123253.GG6201@disturbed>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (Macintosh/20080421)
Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 04:55:29PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
>> Hi Linda,
>> Linda A. Walsh wrote:
>>> my man page says extended xfs attributes can have 256-byte names
>>> with up to 64K of data.
>>> Is there a limit on the number of extended attributes max data size or
>>> name size?
>>> I.e. could I have 1000 attributes with 64K of data each?
>> Yep.
>>> Is there a strong reason why the file and data sizes were limited to
>>> 256/64K?
> ....
>> I'm not sure why 64K was chosen for a value size limit.
> Because changes to EAs are journalled. Hence there must be a bound
> size limit because log space is limited.
Yeah, good point.
Which I guess also reflects how we consider extended attributes
to be more for metadata.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>