Re: [PATCH 15/21] implement generic xfs_btree_rshift

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>]

On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 11:20:42AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > It's the only leakage of the detailed inode root implementation into
> > the generic code, so I'm still wondering whether a method would be
> > better.
> 
> Ah, right. yes, it probably would be cleaner to do it as a
> separate method, but ?? don't think it's that important right now.

That's why I left the XXX in, this is something to get right eventually,
just not now :)