[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 15/21] implement generic xfs_btree_rshift

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] implement generic xfs_btree_rshift
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:31:35 +0200
In-reply-to: <20080802012042.GN6201@disturbed>
References: <20080729193125.GP19104@xxxxxx> <20080730060808.GP13395@disturbed> <20080801194914.GI1263@xxxxxx> <20080802012042.GN6201@disturbed>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 11:20:42AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > It's the only leakage of the detailed inode root implementation into
> > the generic code, so I'm still wondering whether a method would be
> > better.
> Ah, right. yes, it probably would be cleaner to do it as a
> separate method, but ?? don't think it's that important right now.

That's why I left the XXX in, this is something to get right eventually,
just not now :)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>