| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 11/21] implement generic xfs_btree_lookup |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:14:00 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080801194336.GE1263@xxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20080729193104.GL19104@xxxxxx> <20080730045937.GL13395@disturbed> <20080801194336.GE1263@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:43:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:59:37PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > --- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c 2008-07-15 17:46:52.000000000 > > > +0200 > > > +++ linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c 2008-07-15 17:51:41.000000000 > > > +0200 > > > @@ -90,6 +90,54 @@ STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_small(xf > > > */ > > > > > > /* > > > + * Lookup the record equal to [bno, len] in the btree given by cur. > > > + */ > > > +STATIC int /* error */ > > > +xfs_alloc_lookup_eq( > > > > Should these be xfs_allocbt_lookup_*() to be consistent > > with all the other allocbt functions (and inobt_lookup/bmbt_lookup)? > > Currently only the btree_ops methods are named allocbt. Comments on > that scheme would be appreciated. I think I used 'abt' for it. Perhaps 'albt'? allocbt is probably ok, though, just longer. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 09/21] implement generic xfs_btree_increment, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 12/21] implement generic xfs_btree_updkey, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/21] implement generic xfs_btree_lookup, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 12/21] implement generic xfs_btree_updkey, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |