| To: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about extended attributes... |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:32:53 +1000 |
| Cc: | "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4892B361.9030900@xxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <48925495.7040804@xxxxxxxxx> <4892B361.9030900@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 04:55:29PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote: > Hi Linda, > > Linda A. Walsh wrote: > > my man page says extended xfs attributes can have 256-byte names > > with up to 64K of data. > > > > Is there a limit on the number of extended attributes max data size or > > name size? > > > > I.e. could I have 1000 attributes with 64K of data each? > > > Yep. > > > Is there a strong reason why the file and data sizes were limited to > > 256/64K? .... > I'm not sure why 64K was chosen for a value size limit. Because changes to EAs are journalled. Hence there must be a bound size limit because log space is limited. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 12 Veliciraptors again w/x4 card (~1gbyte/sec aggregate read)!, Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.27, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 12 Veliciraptors again w/x4 card (~1gbyte/sec aggregate read)!, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question about extended attributes..., Timothy Shimmin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |